I tried. Again. But the plot has way too many illogical stupidities. And I quit within the first hour.
I get how it was groundbreaking 50 years ago when it put gay men front and center in a narrative that didn’t play us as one-dimensional faggot stereotypes. And I appreciate that it let the gay characters be messy and imperfect and complicated and unlikable for reasons any other character in any other narrative could be unlikable.
But the conceit driving the entire plot was illogical then and it’s illogical now—and we’re no longer in a zeitgeist where gays are so desperate for representation that we’re slavishly thankful for sloppy pop culture just because it mentions us.
Maybe in another 50 years a director or screenwriter will find a plausible way to keep nine arguably unhappy people from en-masse leaving a hostile, toxic, physically violent birthday party before the end of the first act. Until then, I’ll just appreciate the fact that this revival appeared on Broadway and now in this movie starring all out gay actors, many of whom are relatively famous. And for that, I am indeed slavishly thankful.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Books: Monarch
I finished reading Monarch by Candice Wuehle over a week ago and I still don’t know what I think about it. While I was never bored and I reg...

-
Though I was living in Chicago at the time, I was in Cedar Rapids 16 years ago today to visit my folks for their June 14 anniversary. My boy...
-
After a year of unemployment in Chicago where I half-assedly looked for jobs and shuffled back and forth from Cedar Rapids, I more or less o...
-
If I were going to assemble my favoite literary themes and tropes into a novel like it was a Build-A-Bear at the mall, North Woods by Danie...
Hope this isn’t a duplicate. Tried to post it before. Anyway, just watched the movie last night. I agree with everything you said and would add I was disturbed by the vitriolic and demeaning behavior of these “ friends” toward each other.
ReplyDelete